Where it would die · 5 switches
Five claims carry this chapter.
APP-7.1Show there is no structural way to tell override collapsed from override exercised at the cognitive site, and compulsion as narrowed-faster-than-widened fails.
APP-7.2Exhibit a boundary crossing at this site that cannot be measured without importing a value, and one has been smuggled.
APP-7.3Show the noise-floor framing fails for a major mental-illness class at every resolution, and the extension is wrong.
APP-7.4Produce a case where condemnation structurally aids re-widening, and the account of recovery is wrong.
APP-7.5Show the worked case was chosen to avoid uncomfortable verdicts elsewhere, and the discipline is cover.
Every switch above is filed, with its status, in the registry. The registry writes them KS-APP7.1 to KS-APP7.5. What a kill switch is: Where It Would Die, on the wall.
This is the short edition of Ø Applications — a summary. Where a step is compressed here, the original carries it in full. The original book (PDF) · This edition (PDF)
The same page on the420code.org: the420code.org/models/applications/07-cognitive-sovereignty-and-addiction/