Where it would die · 5 switches
Five claims carry this chapter.
APP-5.1Exhibit a case where level three is structurally preferred to level one with level one available, and the ordering is wrong.
APP-5.2Show that coupling-capacity projection cannot be computed without age or ability bias built into its form, and the allocation reading is wrong.
APP-5.3Show that the dignity-floor cannot be specified from the operator architecture and the joint viable set, and it is an imported ethical premise.
APP-5.4Produce a major disease class the five levels do not span, or where the ordering reverses, or where minimum intervention cannot apply, and the hierarchy is partial.
APP-5.5Show empirically a domain where higher-level intervention without a level-one foundation produces more health per unit cost than level one, and the prevention-first commitment is not what the structure produces.
Every switch above is filed, with its status, in the registry. The registry writes them KS-APP5.1 to KS-APP5.5. What a kill switch is: Where It Would Die, on the wall.
This is the short edition of Ø Applications — a summary. Where a step is compressed here, the original carries it in full. The original book (PDF) · This edition (PDF)
The same page on the420code.org: the420code.org/models/applications/05-medicine-and-the-viability-corridor/