Where it would die · 5 switches
Five claims carry this chapter.
APP-11.1Show the criterion is unmeasurable at any policy-relevant resolution in principle, and the installation fails.
APP-11.2Exhibit a conflict where every party fails, inaction also fails, and no structural reading can say which failure is least bad, and the coverage is incomplete.
APP-11.3Exhibit a case where the honest test finds one party cooperative at every resolution and every other party parasitic at every resolution, and the chapter’s discipline prevents that from being said. Ordinary asymmetry does not fire this. The chapter reports it.
APP-11.4Produce a class of collective force the criterion cannot classify at any resolution, and the coverage is partial.
APP-11.5Re-describe the reading, without remainder, as mainstream just-war theory, and this is relabelling. Overlap is expected.
Every switch above is filed, with its status, in the registry. The registry writes them KS-APP11.1 to KS-APP11.5. What a kill switch is: Where It Would Die, on the wall.
This is the short edition of Ø Applications — a summary. Where a step is compressed here, the original carries it in full. The original book (PDF) · This edition (PDF)
The same page on the420code.org: the420code.org/models/applications/11-the-architecture-of-collective-force/